Sagacious Himself — brevity in circumlocution: never blague — suffering genius

July 23, 2014

common failure core: no-choice? As for us we will serve the Lord BY serving children around us ourselves. YOU CAN TOO

We purchased a block of tickets to attend the   We Will Not Conform   live Fathom Event Tuesday night (July 22, 2014).  [ wewillnotconform.com , first of the blaze properties to not use defunct www host ]

People need oft be reminded of progressive’s Smoke and Mirrors tactic:

  • you are alone
  • you are powerless
  • you need be hungry
  • you need be frightened
  • you need be cold
  • you need despair

lies all lies which are only effective when you effect them in yourself.

Only through applied ignorance and defeatism can any free peoples be dispossessed of the benefits of liberty of God given freedom.

While the tools promoted by FreedomWorks are as primitive and ineffectual as F*book and Twit*dom encouraging others to weave new proximate social fabric is a great first step.

In-move Glenn instructed viewers to wield their respective smart phones to participate in ‘live’ polling via ancient sms texting narrow mindedly excluding those who have outgrown such juvescence.  Far more upsetting were the numbers of those who deemed being a TWIT was the most effective communication platform.

F*booking together assures your message is only visible to others already in agreement.  While this watered down version of time tested internets technology is a barely acceptable mode to come together initially it accomplishes nothing to show others the good works of your group.

With XMPP Texting (plus OTR) one or more Jaber IDs one can be roster member of many groups for REAL TIME coordination of needed action, REAL TIME group discussion with moderation options, REAL TIME feedback of events, well developed PubSub, fine grained grant of subscription to availability aspects.

The most glaring deficiencies of sms texting:

  • CONSTRAINED to ONE device
  • NO presence : no indication of availability to receive- or respond to messages
  • NO privacy :  OTR provides wife approved, elder-capable simple encryption to effect privacy
  • COSTLY

MeetUP allows any kind of group to simply orchestrate a namesake

….

 

logic requires rejection of common core dictum

either both and or either or logic requires rejecting the common core dictums

 

 

PRIVACY RAPE as PROFIT

 

Once… One whole brief aside by Glenn Beck in his We Will Not Conform presentation touched on Privacy Rape for Proft… essentially repeating his promise to not sell out client privacy, but more importantly hinting glancing understanding privacy sellout orders of magnitude more profitable than selling a product to people:  selling people as the product

Privacy is a right.  Privacy is NOT a commodity.  Can privacy be sold?  Yes, but so can children. Are children a commodity?  Not properly any more than is privacy a commodity.

Common core is RIFE with privacy rape of children!  for profit!

 

….

 

Would you stand when the jews in your neighborhood were rounded up on tructs by armed goons?  The bar isn’t that high.. yet.  Will you remain silent as children are corralled for no good purpose?

 

We have organized proximately to tutor children in our churches whose parents cannot afford private tutoring.  We provide this at no cost to families; not all of us are theists.  Those who may ask ‘what can I do?‘ will be asked how many minutes or hours a month can you donate to help one child or a few children?

Applying the former Boy Scouts of America child safety protocol:  No non-family adult has any alone time with a child.  In this model the internets are used to connect children with tutors.  No person off the street can signup as a tutor.  Those arrangements are made face to face in a social trust model.  Parents are encouraged to participate.  They are given tools and access to monitor on their phone or device at work or where ever.  They can retroactively monitor all interactions which are logged.  The double benefit is the child can rehash an instructional moment, additionally tutors can be peer examined or cross-train another tutor.

All tools employed are f/oss (Free Open Source Software):  interweb coursewear, internets SIP and XMPP for texting, group discussion, moderated lecture, calling, audio conferencing, video streaming, video archive, video conferencing.  A child can easily scan worksheet and source reference uploading- or emailing to ecosystem.  Some tutors are available live where others are time delayed interactions.

Tutors complete a self identifying survey to pick the best of strengths and capabilities.  This model has been adapted from tech.LDS.org .  Mormons not only seem well organized they actively self improve organizational efficiency.  While the Catholic church was first to the interweb they are mind numbingly slow to adapt the best of technologies.  Our social fabric includes the early interweb church pioneers. We have pulled some of our own respective parishes onto the interweb ahead of diocese growing internets policies.

 

importantwe have more in common than we have in difference.  Pope John Paul II derided for seeking to bring faith communities together.  Such is not an attempt to undermine the church, but to bring together all members of the Body of Christ.  Honest atheists admit the net benefit of Christianity as the Western World.  Some more interesting conversions can be had  between atheists and theists each capable of articulate precision and civility.  Other judges, surgeons, virologists, priests, investment bankers, mathematicians, CEOs, CIOs …  finely crafted reason and judgement rapidly apprehend value but one need not be such to reach common ground.

 

The common core system which is the opposite of the best the market has to offer has been field tested by the microsoft people through their prior- and ongoing

One Laptop One Child

Our ecosystem will lend the technology for the semester/school year and internets access.

Our agenda is:  The True, The Good, The Beatiful: helping each child grow in knowledge and judgement.  We teach above the requirements, we set the bar high but achievable for each child respecting the parent as the primary educator.

Our model can be easily replicated where there is a will and generous hearts.  We have invented no wheel.  We use the tools available to meet the needs of those around us.

You need not expend the same level of effort, time, or money.  YOU CAN TEACH A CHILD YOURSELF.  YOU have life experience, you have the willpower, you are here reading which means you have the livelihood to pay bills like internets access.  You have some modicum of self discipline.  You value truth.

You could even use inferior proprietary tools like horrible skype or outdated sms texting.

Optionally formalize your group with a 501(c)3 registration.  Then the infrastructure providers can offer steep or entire discounts.  Few are those unwilling to give to efforts which clearly benefit children.

In the time it took to write this post you could have written an email to someone you know with the familiarity to organize a simple version of this, including copies to your pastor or priest, and some friends who have friends with children in public school or other deficient education institutions.

 

 

..

 

Does your prospective child’s home have a TV?   Great, for about $60 a Raspberry Pi (with all cables and whatnot) can allow the child access to the internet via TV.   Or $35 if the home has all the other cables and whatnot.  On amazon a used dell core2duo box can be had for less than $150.   Internets can be provisions as plain old dial-up for less than $3/mo.  Are multiple children within a few kilometers of the church or base of volunteerism?  Ubiquity gear can share internets long range, or with special license in the 3Ghz band.  You need not buy equipment; an announcement in your church will quickly reveal all the gear you could need for keeps or on loan.  There is likely to be one lawyer in your church capable of completing a 501(c)3 application, and others willing to split the filing fees.

 

“Ugh I need step by step directions.”

  1. pray for guidance.  if atheist find a friend who has a [life] mentor or trusted giver of advice
  2. first try setting an appointment to speak with your parish technology manager
  3. if not 1 then find a mormon, and ask for guidance from a tech.lds.com adviser  (I am Roman Catholic — look to what we have in common)
  4. else search the interweb:  free tech support forum ,  ask there, be civil, patient, and meek
  5. leave a comment question here

 

 

 

.

.

“I am incredibly made” a reminder to improve humility, a requisite before God the father.

 

501c3 line in the sand

Advertisements

July 17, 2014

make use of african kettle? color propriety and the high pot

[revisiting]

adblock extensions killing the scammers’ interweb unlimited source of victims fantasy?

hopefully

This screenshot taken with “open blockable items” pane of AdBlock Edge expanded upward to show all blocked items on the “content” article deriding adblocking:

cerfing the interweb without adblocking is more foolishly self damaging than it is naive must adblock always interweb

(ajax.google temporarily enabled while attempting to register: blocked by default.  Before whitelisted a suggestion is sent to webmaster encouraging locally caching tools to avoid privacy raping visitors.  Google, an ad platform, hopes their tools are loaded as third party modules all the better to track and repeatedly rape you dearies)

 

Not that there was much to read of the ‘article’.  Without adblocking enabled the page had not finished rendering in well over 12 minutes.  It hanged on s.ytimg and googletagservices.  Not adblocking foolish?  My oh my yes.  How did I not adblock while avoiding injury?  Alternative connectivity.

Make use of is not interested in new registrations that fail to provide them raping privacy revenue:

http://www.makeuseof.com/wp-login.php?action=register

^ disabled.   get edjumakated:  no-www.org

 

The blathering is concentrated in the unqualified declaration:

sites are paid for displaying them either per-click or, in some cases, via a flat monthly fee

 

And HOW precisely does that function?  The author prefers willful ignorance as do most insisting they have presented an argument (they haven’t).

“you owe me”

No, I don’t.

Article relies on self evident falsehood:

but without ad revenues, there’d be nothing to read

Wrong!  How did the interweb funciton prior to the first scumbag advertiser?  (not all advertisers are scumbags)

Yes, johnny, the interweb predated privacy raping!  There weren’t hoards of imbeciles.  As with joining any other society one approaches with hesitation and respect as it is joining. One participates respectfully with civility.  Forum moderation is nearly dead with selfish indifference cancer.

 

Free lunch is real.

I have something to offer to those who sought it.  I expect nothing in return.

  • My interweb participation is CHARITABLE.
  • I came to GIVE.
  • I shall continue to GIVE.
  • Obviously I shall not give as much or even at all if/when I am not self sufficient.
  • I must care for myself and mine first.  This is NOT greed.
  • Inordinate self interest is greed.
  • Self interest is duty to myself and God.

 

If you do not want your content in the public sphere………  drum roll ……. don’t put it in the public sphere.  Protect it with BasicAuth (do use your interweb search skills) or other PayWall.

“but I want my site in the public sphere to be seen and complain when people see it because it is a not-public thing I am offering in public [insert other inanity]”

 

So close to illumination…

It’s obvious that without revenue to support quality content, that content will disappear

Yes, I covered that already; See above outline:  “If/when I am not self sufficient”.

Also true

the world will be worse off because of it

Yes, when there are fewer charitable people building the interest the world will be ‘worse off’.  It certainly isn’t better with profiteering by raping privacy rogues.

 

No honest exchange to be had there on their question:

If advertisements disappeared from all sites today, this is what would become of the web. [?]

It would improve in quality and dignity.  There would be free market to select winners for micropayment systems.  Much like the content I purchase now through a variety of platforms.  When it stops being of value to me I discontinue purchasing.  Sites will no longer treat viewers as chattle; raping privacy will cease.  Society will codify laws creating just consequence for raping privacy all the more lurid when the victims are minor — already unable to contract.

The irrational- and willfully ignorant are not exclusively proponents of privacy raping they are occasionally consumers

if people who want to see quality content on the web at no charge

People with righteous expectations of consuming content produced by the interweb charitable?  They’re not irrational.  Is the author creatively describing content piracy?

Piracy: not providing just compensation.

In the proper interweb model of charity there is no piracy concern.

If in the author’s construction there are no longer third party ads on the interweb…  when this obvious obviousnesses of logic is intentionally ignored…. ah, yes, we having a blathering ‘article’ insisting adblocking is evil and the interweb has always been such a way that it had never been ad nausea.

How about another bite of irrationalberry pie?

So long as Google and Microsoft remain powerful companies with great influence over how people view the Internet, advertising will remain the primary means of generating revenue.

 

They are?  That is some masterful control.  Care to explain how that works?  A clockwork orange setup while we sleep?

The irlogic is ilrefutable!

 say no to blocking ads [and embrace endless privacy rape]

Someone needs to take a refresher course on the mechanics of power.   adBlock is my NO to assent to be profoundly violated.

I am not a pirate.

 

see also:  Defective Business Model Syndrome

 

afterdawn cluein archive Defective Business Model Syndrome

 

 

Knowingly [willfully ignorant] injuring others for profit is wrong.  If you believe the contrary would you make an argument in favor of child slavery or other human trafficking?

 

 

April 16, 2014

The Blaze privacy hypocrisy : third party loads extracting profit via privacy rape

Filed under: AdNoyances,interweb,PRaP — Sagacious Himself @ 7:12 am
Tags: , ,

 

The Blaze touts 1791.com, email respecting user privacy, with some smtp naivete, yet their namesake domain loads all this junk

TheBlaze privacy hypocrisy

youtardtube video? really?  Why not vidmeo less evil or neutral the archive?

 

September 3, 2013

users request Informed-Consent to opt-in to ad”block” plusads ACCEPTABLE PRIVACY RAPE to palatant’s eyeo bank account ads pay VIG

Filed under: AdNoyances,DARPA — Sagacious Himself @ 8:00 pm
Tags: , ,

ad”block” plus-ads forum: Acceptable Ads should be off by default
adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16666

 Ask away during installation if we want to turn it on, and explain why we would want it on. But have it off by default. “AdBlock Edge”, an add-on which does just that, is what I replaced ABP with just now. I am just saying, if you want AdBlock Plus to be the first choice for people who like having ads blocked, it should do what it says all the time..

Palant-logic

 If we ask users to enable this feature then most of them won’t do it

Unfortunately users won’t make the choice most profitable to Wladimir Palant which is apparently palant-unacceptable. How long until the “opt” out toggle does nothing other than visually toggle?

 

via wilderssecurity ad”block” plus-ads mafia
wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=349411

mobilegeeks.de/adblock-plus-undercover-einblicke-in-ein-mafioeses-werbenetzwerk/

telekom-presse.at/Adblock_Plus_-_wer_verarscht_hier_eigentlich_wen.id.26246.htm

“acceptable” ads must pay a VIG  (vigorish, charge to show ads)

eyeo.com SHOWS “better” ads THROUGH ad”block” plus-ads:

eyeo.com SHOWS ads so surfers THROUGH adblockplus

all while touting “choice” — the same “choice” you made to “opt” into this feature by installing ad”block” plus-ads

Adblock Plus lets you block all unwanted ads

Unless of course ALL ADS ARE UNWANTED.   At eyeo.com they know you WANT palant-acceptable ads.  How could you not with his stellar integrity of megalomania choice-enforcement?  Eyeo.com claims 80% of ADP users like being bitch-slapped into compliance.

 

Eyeo.com has the same DEFECTIVE grasp of the English word “free”:  the COST.

PRIVACY RAPE ads are “acceptable” ads:  acceptable rape

The VERY reason to block ads is to NOT allow privacy rape by small set of third party servers.   It is NEVER acceptable to harm others for profit.

Showing third party ads IS NOT a business model.

c.dommers@eyeo.com

 

saga cious * him self

 

.

October 2, 2012

google now apple siri compete to create NSA wet dream live

Filed under: All Your Base,DARPA,Marxism,privacy — Sagacious Himself @ 9:23 am
Tags: , , , ,

siri or google now : “they” are using “your” phone to always listen.  The ultimate marketing pitch illuminates social indifference to privacy rape as profit.  Sheeple volunteer for voxel ovens

sure “for convenience” like google voice does — ahem as google claims it has never done despite call leg bridging

NSA deep pockets with it’s hands deep in google’s unmentionables

oh, KBG, you were born too soon

I await delightful Peoples Cube posters

all praise chairman obama or else death squad by executive order.  I will be publishing circumventing facial recognition with simple contrast elements

Blog at WordPress.com.