blocking trackers is sufficient, but poisoning them is better
Eyeo gmbh, the owner of ad “block” plus ads, is not to be trusted- or relied upon to block ads any further than you can throw wladimir palant
” and non-intrusive ad standards”
eyeo is built upon lies and half truths
In January 2006 Wladimir Palant wrote Adblock Plus. Less than a year later Adblock Plus was the most downloaded [via press kit]
Eyeo implies Wlad created the first adblock extension: FALSE. It wasn’t even the second or third incarnation.
Somehow third party privacy raping is not considered ‘intrusive’. Can you think of anything more intrusive?
eyeo does NOT promote first party ads.