ad”block” plus-ads forum: Acceptable Ads should be off by default
Ask away during installation if we want to turn it on, and explain why we would want it on. But have it off by default. “AdBlock Edge”, an add-on which does just that, is what I replaced ABP with just now. I am just saying, if you want AdBlock Plus to be the first choice for people who like having ads blocked, it should do what it says all the time..
If we ask users to enable this feature then most of them won’t do it
Unfortunately users won’t make the choice most profitable to Wladimir Palant which is apparently palant-unacceptable. How long until the “opt” out toggle does nothing other than visually toggle?
via wilderssecurity ad”block” plus-ads mafia
“acceptable” ads must pay a VIG (vigorish, charge to show ads)
eyeo.com SHOWS “better” ads THROUGH ad”block” plus-ads:
all while touting “choice” — the same “choice” you made to “opt” into this feature by installing ad”block” plus-ads
Adblock Plus lets you block all unwanted ads
Unless of course ALL ADS ARE UNWANTED. At eyeo.com they know you WANT palant-acceptable ads. How could you not with his stellar integrity of megalomania choice-enforcement? Eyeo.com claims 80% of ADP users like being bitch-slapped into compliance.
Eyeo.com has the same DEFECTIVE grasp of the English word “free”: the COST.
PRIVACY RAPE ads are “acceptable” ads: acceptable rape
The VERY reason to block ads is to NOT allow privacy rape by small set of third party servers. It is NEVER acceptable to harm others for profit.
Showing third party ads IS NOT a business model.
saga cious * him self