The decision tree used by both paypal and google wallet to flag an account as LIMITED requiring subsequent verification of your identity have several absurd assumptions and the ‘shocker’: law-breakers will continue to break laws no matter how many more laws are passed on the subject
Those people will do what they want to do. Add Limited + ID verification “plan” will cause casual ID borrowing or motivate outright ID theft (and concomitant financial/credit theft)
Paypal ‘agreement’ continues to be summarizable as:
paypal is the sole arbiter of truth [especially when it’s not and you waive all your rights or otherwise agree to the same]
But the arbitrary ‘logic’ for flagging an account LIMITED adds user security risk and needless annoyance to casual user who doesn’t want a paypal account
then you’ll find paypal asking for documents security experts say to NEVER provide via the interweb, fax, email. Don’t do it: don’t send paypa or other interweb site l scans of your passport, don’t send paypal or other interweb site scans of your state id.
More silly ID laws passed also assume everyone in the creation/verification chain are well adjusted, honorable people. Law breakers will find other law breakers in this chain and then ENTIRE INTENT of system FOILED AGAIN.
E Pluribus Plures?
FROM MANY.. MANY MORE; NEEDLESS LAWS
congress was designed for ‘gridlock’ or SLOW changes and not intended to be a full time occupation
Also remember sheeple: ALWAYS opt-out of binding arbitration after allowing yourself to be pressured into signing binding arbitration agreement. Must be within 29 days postmarked AND written on paper.