Sagacious Himself — brevity in circumlocution: never blague — suffering genius

December 1, 2010

definitions are exclusionary by construction: why are there no round triangles? marriage can only ever be of one man and one woman wherein the potential for conception dwells

Filed under: Gross Politix,Gulagosphere — Sagacious Himself @ 8:06 pm

delineating the definition of marriage is discriminatory and altogether unfair to those who are not in accord with the definition

faggot couples demand equal protection under the law wherein their more equaler status entitles them to the civic benefits of married couples.

What’s worse single people are not afforded the civic benefits of married couples!

Not only must we be treated identically but we must have identical outcomes.  Because equal has the same definition as identical obviously.

Refrain from adherence to definitions: everything means whatever the appetite desires until it doesn’t.

Contradictions even if possible are not-contradictory… by definition?

Never say never true! |



Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a civil reply. We strongly recommend you always adblock the interweb [uBlock Origin]. You have no right to be published here. Abuse will be redacted or transmogrified. Post your Jabber Texting info (xmpp jid) should you prefer a different kind of interaction. Please refer to CONTACT page for terms, details, or special considerations such as private comments:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: