Should not phones primarily BOTH
(1) have excellent signal reception/relay
(2) have excellent audio fidelity / vocoders
Does the motorola droid? who knows?! The engineers might not have bothered testing. What has happened to the motorola name? merely YAPP (yet another phone producer)?
Does anyone test PHONE network connectivity or test PHONE voice quality anymore?
As long as a phone is SHINY, small, light, and run programs to delight the feckless surely it will be a winning selling product…
Soon the generation who inflicted contraceptives on society will in turn receive the similar gift of euthanaia. … iTards and useful idiots first.. then second generation iTards.. then public school employees and overseers…
I want a slimmer motorola e815. HTC has one passable PHONE, but I am not interested in paying a $60/month verizon FINE. One cannot opt-out of the verizon penalty fee. I want to use the PHONE as a PHONE and nothing more (than the occasional SMS).
edit: even eWeek doesn’t bother to review PHONES as a PHONE per se... seems like eWeek has moved to the iTards column
Where are the QUALITY PHONES????
edit: droid “does” stuff but how well IS it a PHONE?