here you go, O

http://safely.yahoo.com/?q=node/32&nodetype=article

algore Fiat Lux

[ Himself.wordpress.com ]

black racists don’t like me commenting on their racism — censorship for all…. who aren’t liberalists

[ Himself.wordpress.com ]

self replicating fix for the economy

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/01/22/2143809.htm?site=queensland

A rare new species of plant that eats small rats has been discovered at the tip of Cape York.

Pitcher plants, otherwise known as flesh-eating plants, grow throughout Cape York but now a new, larger species that grows like a vine has been discovered.

The new species has been called “Tenax”.

James Cook University ecologist Charles Clarke and a colleague found the new species at a swamp near the Jardine River, but exactly where is a secret.

“They are quite vulnerable,” he said.

“They are only found in a few small areas and if we broadcast the location then there are people out there who would take advantage of that.

“There’s a lot of interest in pitcher plants from Australia, even from people outside of Australia.

“And while people often associate these things with New Guinea or Borneo or Sumatra, the fact that there’s more species here is actually very exciting.”

Once it begins to eat liberalists we’ll have a self replicating fix for the economy

[ Himself.wordpress.com ]

iHome for iTards everywhere

clicky clicky

.

..

…

….

^^ Filter Google results userscript is awesome… bannish wiki*edia, truth by consensus, with ease

[ Himself.wordpress.com ]

worried about trojanitous? apprehensive about evilware? VIRUStotal.com to the rescue

VIRUStotal.com

scan it thoroughly

yes, it: singular.  Scan ONE file at a time with multiple engines sequentially.  Upload/email them a file, wait patiently in the queue, and watch not-so-realtime as the file is scanned

(imageshack.us was taking waaaaay to long to transload)

sifting articles of value from those heavy on scientificalality

:sigh:

pesky scientificalality

One Laptop per Child the most ridiculous liberalist project?

Educating children is admirable.. however what good is a laptop to children who cannot read?

Once they’re taught to read do they really need a laptop?  What’s wrong with using books?

Aside from that pesky reading issue OLPC has a seriously flawed premise:

 Children need to learn learning

Yes, that’s an actual quote from their wiki.  The ability to learn is innate, as is the ability to discern truth.  If learning were not innate it certainly could never be learned

Without the ability to learn how does one learn to learn?

rediculous!

tracking moralphobia: Neologisminess

thank you loyal minions

Neologisminess

“If Truthiness is not neologism neither is moralphobia! The neologisminess value of a word fades in proportion to the fame of the one who utters the word? Misunderestimate must have an even lower neologisminess than truthiness’s neologisminess!”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Truthiness

Wait until Ann Coulter uses the word….

when pro-queer lobby invades in-bedroom education, parents should not be offended?? mmmm liberalese hypocrisy

riiiight. And what of other deviants like some sociopaths? ‘They were born with the inclination to rape and murder. They are entitled to their feelings. You cannot tell them not to derive sexual pleasure from torturing innocent people nor can you prevent them from sating themselves’

isn’t relativism fun?

wait.. the typical response will make some reference to hurt or injury and or consent. The *thumbnailed* response is to have you recognize intangible injury, as from this thread the non-physical damage done to a child, transcendental if you will. If you cannot admit of the former then the discussion is over as your values are such.. your attempt to inflict your deviant expectation of warped-tolerance. If you do grasp the concept we can explore further the type of injury upon another in a consensual deviant sexual relationship and the nature of love, which has not yet been explored here.

Consent does not mitigate harm. Choice does not effect justice. Perception does not effect change in the object. Freedom is not license. Unwanted consequences do not cease to exist.

Homosexual acts, as with other deviant activities with regard to grave issues, are an affront to the dignity of the actor and recipient, and then some.

The hypocritical intolerance is rife. Why can’t you people be tolerant of parents who don’t wish to scandalize their own children? That’s awfully hateful of you. Only you have the right to be offended? Why is that exactly?

What about to each his own?

You queers get bent out of shape when you think other people are controlling how you live, but yet when the pro-deviant movement tries regulate what parents teach their children, and those same parents object you’re shocked? Keep your moralphobia to yourself.

You deny absolute truth, and then insist that the tenants of liberalism are the only truth? Nope, no faulty logic there.

Anarchy for all?

(As a teeny tiny minority are you sure that’s a wise ideology for you deviants to pursue?)

refuting relativism — read it again contratheist

theists and contratheists alike should absorb:
http://carm.org/relativism/relativism_refute.htm

let’s let soldiers vote on orders! useful in Iraq, Iran, North Korea and other wars

let’s let soldiers vote on orders! Don’t like a strategy? Use your portable red/green thumb remote.

Why stop there?

Setup http://WAR.int
and allow real-time, global voting! That way raucous non-citizens
(especially those in other counties) can efficaciously inflict their
defective views on the United States of America…. and ultimately
control the citizenry by implementing liberalese martial law!!

think the way the “free” thinkers want you to think… or be accused or not-thinking for yourself or of conformance

mmm liberalism… great stuff!

( yeah, decide for yourself… as long as its not deciding to pursue faith because then you wouldn’t be thinking the way the “free” thinkers want you to think. )

false dilemma fallacy. God and science aren’t mutually exclusive.
Interpreting a foundations story for an ancient desert tribe literally
gets us nowhere.

Why is there something rather than nothing? Where did the 4 forces come from, natural selection?

nothing is better than heaven
a ham sandwich is better than nothing
clearly… a ham sandwich is better than heaven

We need more churches.  More would lead to a better outcoume, like an “infinite number” of
monkeys in a room with writing implements. But religion definately
needs more synergy, and openness where all beliefs are just as good as
the next like in those lovely Methodist TV commercials. Thank the
spaghetti monster for liberalism! Contention and strife are an
illusion. Each is obviously entitled to the be sole arbiter of truth.

yes, something is more fit to survive than nothing… that’s why it won the evolutionary race.  Its obvious that order can come from lack of order, and by its own volition, especially without agency.

As all the other science minded people know deep down in their hearts its well within the scope of science to ask why the universe was created.  Science answers all.  It is without limitation.

what happens when you don’t understand the word fascism? and have a not-good knowledge of history?

you might write an article entitled

what is good about fascism?

that tries to seriously compare the word to the United States

:blink:

sweet.. a new engine token

diggetized

apologetics in mp3 format… audiocasting evangelism

Why not to shop at walmart this Christmas season … or any time … until Walmart re-adopts its founder’s Christian values

Would Jesus Shop at Wal-Mart?

Jesus might ’shop’ at walmart because he ate with sinners, reprobates, and the like.  Jesus loves all including those with honosexual tendancies.  Remember he forgave the whore telling her to go AND sin no more… not hey your cool have a nice day.  Activities not chaste (or otherwise not virtuous) are not to be tolerated… the person is in need of conversion, repentance, forgivness, absolution, and amended behavior.

The question is: should YOU shop at Walmart today?  especially given their new position of donating 5% of proceeds to pro-homosexual-activity (anti-Christian) advocacy groups…  obviously the answer is certainly not!  Just as YOU shouldn’t buy Ben n Jerry ice cream as a large slice of their proceeds are donated to pro-natal-child-slaughter-houses (abotion).

Homosexual activites are sinful (evil) and therefore must NOT be tolerated, nor should one tolerate, encourage, or enable others to do or support likewise.  The same is true for pro-wrong-choice groups (abotion).

united methodist church: its all good

that’s right, join up and believe whatever you want, you’re welcome there.  its all good: nothing is wrong as long as you believe its right.  A church that advertises liberalism.

WOW

that’s some nerve

its the kind of church secular humanists would like

SciFi markets feast as: Fucking Awesome — that’s not fucking cool

yes, “Fucking Awesome”.   They produced the trailer, and opted to include the profanity:

that was not fucking cool of them

GeeHades abuse google: blogging for alahahaha

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=22235_Holy_Warriors_Using_Blogspot&only

yes, GeeHades  (minions of Satan)

Clinton Faults Bush Admin. on Security

So Bush was responsible for the security policy during the Clinton
admin when the FIRST attack of the world trade center happened??

Bush
must have been using that time travel device to plant WMD in arab
countries…. so the slaughter of the kurds in Iraq with WMD under
saddam insane was really Bush’s fault, too!

It must be rooted in the relationship he didn’t have with those drugs

ShortShip Pro — first NAGWARE firefox extension ever!

http://shortship.com/

Until hacked it requires the user to activate it: click their affiliate link once every seven days or the extension will cease to function correctly. Extensions don’t have the power to disable themselves, so it will just cease to show the shipping charges on ebay search results.

Since the source contains this entertaining message:

shortship.jar\shortship.js

AD REMOVAL - screw ebay ads, we already pay them 15% to use their service, and we value our desk space they shouldnt care, theres already a plethora of adblock type extensions available.

I’m sure ShortShip won’t mind having their activation removed. screw nagware.

“and is affililate supported. Both are completely free for you to use, and both are free of nag screens, pop ups, pop unders, or any other annoying things that I hate in software and would not expect users to have to put up with.” — oscar

And if it were OPT-in supported:

- shortship firefox “plugin” wouldn’t have to be nagware
- only one version would need to be released
- simply installing a product is NOT sufficient for an OPT-in model
- short ship pro stealing toolbar space IS ANNOYING

Do NOT try this at home as it will annoy the nagware author:

download the extension
append .zip to the filename
extract the contents and directory structure
find and unpack the JAR file in the chrome subdirectory
using a real text editor (neither notepad nor wordpad) open [filename].js
search for [stuff] change the second and third instance of false to true
save the file
open the extension as zip, navigate to the chrome directory, open the jar, drag [filename].js into WinRAR, close winrar, when prompted update the xpi.zip, close the first instance of winrar, remove the .zip (so the extension is only xpi)
drag the xpi into firefox to install the hacked shortship pro extension

there, now its no longer nagware. IF you enjoy the extension donate to the author

again do NOT perform the steps in this thought experiment

thought experiment temporarily munged as I wrote it from memory and do not recal the particulars of the ONE file needing modification or the search point for the nagware timer. There are many entertaining ways to do this. When the author makes his extension comply with the spirit of mozilla by making the payment system OPT-in this hack will no longer be necessary. Sure you could comply with his wishes… but whose to say that what he wants should trump what you want? Espcially if you’re not re-distributing his extension

oh no, shortship pro guy, other people are onto you, too

this is exactly why wikipedia has little value — infested by liberalists and hypocritical deviants

http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Homophobia

I am confused. If we aren’t holding words to their literal meaning, why are we writing encyclopedia entries about them?   — bikeable (talk) 19:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

The pedophiles and liberalists have on many occasions deleted WORDS like “moralphobe” and “moralphobia” calling them neologisms all the while wrongly tolerating the entry on the colloquialism “homophobia”.  Double standard?  The talk article even linked to “Moralityphobia“.  It was swiftly delted in a state of frantic moralphobia.

Moralphobia APTLY describes the fear driving the deletion of the word itself.  As commented above there’s no place in wikipedia for the colloquialism “homophobia”.

wikipedia moralphobia — deletion log filled with moralphobic comments

Moralphobia

Neologism, nonsense. Rhobite 08:21, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

• In a world where there can be homo”phobia” there can certainly be
  moralphobia. Motivation to delete this article is self referential:
  caused by moralphobia. Comment by User:Crushthem
  • Unfortunately I have no idea what “moralphobia” is. Neither does the OED or Webster’s. Rhobite 08:29, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
    • fortunately “homophobia” hasn’t long been in the OED. We’re
      witnessing an evolution of language here on wikipedia. Moralphobia is
      quite real as evidenced by the irrational desire to censor the new wiki
      article. Where is liberalisms oft touted tolerance now? Comment by User:Crushthem
      • I think the “oft touted tolerance” left the building at the precise
        moment you started ranting about “moral deviancy.” And don’t call me a
        liberal. Rhobite 08:38, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
        • And how much ranting is in this article:
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_deviant Is it the word “deviant”
          that has set you off? Why don’t you move to delete the previously cited
          article? Comment by User:Crushthem
      • We’re witnessing an evolution of language here on wikipedia. — No, we’re witnessing an example of Newspeak. Delete. Uncle G 12:26, 2005 Jan 21 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. –Carnildo 08:34, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • right because that argument didn’t apply to this article:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Homophobia What are you people
    ‘afraid’ of? Comment by User:Crushthem
    • “Neologism” means “new word”. A word that only gets 8 Google hits
      and isn’t in any dictionary doesn’t need an article on Wikipedia. As
      for what I’m afraid of, I’m afraid of Wikipedia becoming a collection
      of trivia rather than an encyclopedia. –Carnildo 08:47, 21 Jan 2005
      (UTC)
      • So then wikipedia articles need only be grossly redundant to
        google? Moralphobia applies to essentially the same minority compsed by
        those who claim to be homosexual. Comment by User:Crushthem 1:54a PST, 21 Jan 2005
• Delete. Not notable enough to be in an encyclopedia. JibJub 08:44, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Is this notable enough for you: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=13476 Comment by User:Crushthem
    • What does that article have to do with “moralphobia”? –Carnildo 09:02, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Considering the only real “absolute truth” is
  death, this is a poorly constructed agenda trying to pass as insight.
  Such fun. In any case, neologism, non-notable, and probable eternal pov problems. Arcuras 09:22, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and refer User:Crushthem to Wikipedia:Don’t disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Dbiv 10:05, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• “We’re witnessing an evolution of language here on wikipedia.” Delete as poor attempt at neologism. — Asbestos | Talk 11:18, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism. Even if it was a well-established word,
  it’s still just a dictionary entry, and would get deleted either way.
  See Wikipedia is not… Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:59, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this POV neologism with extreme prejudice - because I
  never claimed to be open-minded or tolerant. Kael 12:31, 21 Jan 2005
  (UTC)
• Delete. This is not an encyclopedia article. This is unmitigated twaddle. –Zarquon 12:48, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. Well, I see the point of the neologism. But what I feel could define it would be something like not
  liking to be told something is good/should be done, even though it is
  commonly accepted as beeing good in a specific cultural context. The
  same for “bad”. An example: It would be stupid from me to reject
  all teaching of the bible on the basis I am not christian. Indeed some
  moral teaching from this book are actually good, common sens ( as in
  other religions, philosophies…) but the catch… It’s all too relative. Good/bad/moral are not absolute concepts. As absolut truth
  concept is not either. Even in a spcecified culture, variations can be
  mind-blowing, to the extent that it blows away the basis of this
  neologism. Shorthand: fundamentaly POV. So: delete. Gtabary 12:58, 21
  Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The argument based on the claim that there could be a word like this is preposterous. Josh Cherry 13:42, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not the place for coining neologisms nor a platform to promote their use. — Curps 21:32, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the nonsensical neoligism. — ckape (talk) 00:59, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, because we here at VfD suffer from POV-phobia. What criterion for deletion doesn’t this article meet? Szyslak 03:29, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • comment: - original research? =P Arcuras 04:14, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)
    • That’s what I’d say, but there was no “research” involved. It’s
      more of an “original rant.” Szyslak 10:05, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC) (it still
      falls under Wikipedia’s definition of original research, but it’s my
      opinion that the word “research” is too good for this crap. –Szyslak)
• Delete, unless citations can be made showing actual usage of
  this “word” outside the mind of the article creator. –Dtobias 04:10,
  23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like
some other VfD subpages, is no longer ‘live’. Subsequent comments on
the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be
placed on the relevant ‘live’ pages. Please do not edit this page.

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live.
Further comments should be made on the article’s talk page rather than
here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:27, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)

plans to solve the high gas price problem

(1) mine US oil! — who cares about a few deer. animals have zero rights.. except the right be be tasty

(2) cut taxes — always a great plan

(3) cut spending — I can’t print my own money and as the state only
has the right I do by extension has no right to print new money to
spend either

(4) dump liberalist favored government programs — funding evil is never wise

(5) “use less” is not a plan

(6) ignore liberalists with “secret plans”

hahaha…. now for an econazi perspective:

Why not just remove gas tanks from cars?  Then no one would be able to use gas.  Problem solved.  woo. 

No, wait, let’s remove personal freedom and dictate each must drive State Brand ™  TheCar.  It will be solar powered exclusively.  That will reduce night time traffic considerably.

Orr just pass a law demanding that machines be built to make gas in one’s garage?  Or by edict declar that the properties of gas are now such that it produces better milage (UN style)

Start a letter writing campaign and whine until suppliers lower price.  Threaten that you won’t be putting gas in your ethanol car to teach them a lesson.

Walk more.  It’s environmentally friendly.  Be sure your shoes contain no oil products and CERTAINLY no animal products!  Avoid walking on plants.  You might hurt their feelings.

So little time, so many great solutions to force on people!

EMO PC on the horizon? emotionally abusive friends plus EMO PC = EmORtification

suffer emotionally abusive friends?  Soon you might be abused by hardware

http://digitaljournal.com/news/index.php?articleID=4786

not only is vista not “more secure” it CANNOT access the required memory requirements ( Subverting Vista Kernel For Fun And Profit )

/PAE is hardly a solution.  Until hardware catches up with memory requirements of Vista I see little point to rushing in especially as the bloat doesn’t carry increased security (decreased insecurity).  Sadly many soho portable mp3 players can address more ram than soho PCs.
HITBSecConf2006 - Malaysia » Joanna Rutkowska (Senior Security …

hint:  malware continues to be the IT cash cow

oh look… other people are now saying “malware injection”  mwahahaha
http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3624861

linux and tinfoil hat? stay healthy and keep tinfoil or aluminum foil deflector beanie people away

for the good kind of suspicion oft mislabeled as paranoia by the mentally crippled

http://tinfoilhat.shmoo.com/

fascist-ready ™ chip implant technology: its for the children

A tiresome argument for fascist-ready ™ technology sounds like AlGore: its for the children

http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2006/07/15/raise-your-right-hand-chip-implants-for-everyone/

Or children who have been abducted.

remember Franklin….

They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither

The Sagacious Solution ™ is to carry a device that spams RFID signals. There’s little sense trying to block the information… so give LOTS and LOTS of bad data to devalue the information

Musika for the inured, fornication inclined who totally lack honor

http://rapidshare.de/files/24988720/04_-_Don_t_Make_No_Promises__Your_Body_Can_t_Keep_.mp3.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/25083806/Alone_in_Death_s_Shadow.mp3.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/25083974/The_Declaration_of_Indifference.mp3.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/25084902/The_Sinful_Ensemble.mp3.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/25085410/The_widdershins_jig.mp3.html

wikipedia reveals its lack of value beyond the scope of hard science

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eon8

.. of course there’s also their inane self referential use of ‘neologism’.

FLASH PANIC … for simpletons

the call of fornication — selfishness that murders

the worst part is that MANY birth “control” pills are in actuality ABORTIFACIENTS. Yes, your fornication generates life, and the “control” prevents the single cell human from implanting (for long) in the uterine wall!!

GenPets - Genetically Engineered Pets? or Bioengineered Buddies? stop killing kittens

http://www.genpets.com/index.php

mmm hmmmm LOL

Is bioengineering this far advanced?

In 2003 Human DNA was successfully combined with rabbit (and
other animals), to create successful Chimera Hybrids. Read
National Geographic for more information

Be sure to watch FullMetal Alchemist before purchase. ;)  Alchemist’s Stone included with purchase of two or more pets when you mention this wordpress blog

I’ll wait for genetically engineered kittens:  never age, always cute, always clumsy.  When they learn too much?  Inject InstanCute ™.

StraightPride.com - the right to be proud .. a queer free zone

clothes to wear proudly

http://straightpride.com/

straight pride is nothing queer

feel the power of RoadRunner EXTREME

sure, it’s still in beta, but when it works it rocks

DD-WRT QoS is only capable of 8 Mbits/s downstream

you might have BroadBand at home… but I have UltraBand

queers should not get the benefits of marriage

queers cannot be married. Being not-married couples cannot receive any benefits of marriage anymore than a single person can claim the benefits of marriage.

:duh:

Patrick Guerriero is … well an advocate of Satan

Do we need to amend the Constitution to ban queer abusive re-definition of marriage?

Hmmm. Pat says no. He claims as the majority of people affirm that marriage is to be between a man and a woman we need not modify the Constitution.

Wait.. don’t we live in a demrocratic republic? Didn’t those same most people affirm that slavery should be [banned]? Did we really need to amend the Constitution?

Oh, it doesn’t matter what the majority wants in a democracy when it offends a teeny, tiny, perverse minority!

Queer advocates of satan: marriage isn’t really a big issue. Gas prices are more imporant, oh and the economy. So since its not an issue we shouldn’t be wasting any time on it.

most people: shut up already

video-recording highschool cheerleader dancing a crime? only mental cripples think so

WHY is it considered a crime to video-record the SALACIOUS dancing of highschool cheerleaders? Hello? Their LUDE gyrations are performed IN PUBLIC with school- and parental SANCTION (which is really the crime). Their behaviour is age-INNAPROPRIATE.

Their lascivious dancing: not a crime
watching them dance: not a crime
TV broadcasting them: not a crime
recording tv broadcast: not a crime

recording their dancing yourself: a crime?….. NO. Clearly not.
Selling that recording: a crime??….. NO. Clearly not.

“The Media”, school administrators, and some parents think the latter two are crimes. That is SUCH POOR LOGIC.

If recording them is producing pornography, then the cheerleaders’ actions are pornographic. Then the parent’s and the school are guilty of at least: child abuse, some kind of sex crime, child endangerment, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

cartouche? cartoon? .. kartOO is still online

and still very flashy

hopefully someone else has discovered how to remove the ’sponsor’ adNoyances*.

* yet another awesome word coined by Sagacious Himself in 2003.  This week  includes ‘SEO Black Boxing’.. but never forget moralphobe, moralphobia, and moralphobic! … the latter three are now in use by other people.  teehee

you’re a liberalist

Intolerant of intolerance? yeah, you’rea a liberalist. See also my article on the evilness of whiteness

See also: moralphobe (word coined at himself.blogspot.com)