FCC claims fascist powers date back to 1934
http://fcc.gov/eb/otherinfo/inspect.html
If you come into my home unannounced at night you WILL BE SHOT DEAD.
Please, bring a warrant and ring the bell first.
My power comes from the much older and actually valid Second Amendment.
.
What percentage of people not having sex contract an STD from having sex? zero percent.
What percentage of condoms fail? 17%
What percentage of children are slaughtered by femal “birth” control (abortifacients)? anything over zero is too high
–
What’s the most effective way to avoid spreading STDs? Stop abusing sexuality: no faggotry, no fornication, no unloving sexual acts.
–
ALL STDS are 100% preventable. AIDS research is an abhorrent WASTE of money. Spend that money on something beneficial like child cancer research.
Seven of the children in the Maine group who had been tested on the WISC, WISC-R, WPPSI, or K-ABC intelligence tests scored between 139 and 155, with only two scoring above 145. They were then given the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale [Form L-M].On this test, these same children scored between 169+ and 194. One child’s score showed a discrepancy of more than 50 points between the K-ABC and the Stanford-Binet (143 as opposed to 194); another had a similar discrepancy between the WISC (139) and the Stanford-Binet L-M (187+). In the Colorado group, similar discrepancies were found for the six children who had been tested on both the WISC-R and the Stanford-Binet L-M. Only one child in the 170+ range scored above 150 on the WISC-R, and another scored as low as 135.Since the time that article was released, an additional child has been found who scored 182 on the Stanford-Binet (Form L-M) and 127 on the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition. Another scored 137 on the WISC-R, and a year later tested 229+ on the Stanford-Binet (Form L-M), at the age of nine missing only two items on the entire test! This “test artifact” amounts to blatant discrimination against the highly gifted, and has major implications for the location of gifted students, and for their placement in programs. The situation is shocking, but no one appears to be paying attention because the highly gifted are not of central interest to test constructors. In contrast, the gifted and highly gifted were definitely important to Lewis Terman, who constructed the original Stanford-Binet. Among other things, Terman planned to use the test to find potential “geniuses,” so he had an investment in creating a difficult enough examination with a high enough ceiling to permit their discovery.
Don’t throw away the old binet
And certainly stop wasting money on the mentally cripple and the terminally average.. Focus efforts- and funding on those AT LEAST four standard deviations above the mean on the L-M.
Public schools need a better sieve for highly gifted students… for anyone left who values the public good.
“Should everyone have free health care?”
Certainly not! Medical service, like having a maid service or owning a car, is a PRIVILEGE and NOT a right. One, however, is individually obligated to care for one’s own health. But one cannot enslave others performing this service nor can one expect others to perform this service without compensating them.
Socialist health care is akin to promoting slavery.
… sometimes known as capping or shaping.
I’d send a letter with my payment for the month explaining why I’m only paying [insert % here].. comparing the reduction in services and payment to the clearly defined word “unlimited”
you might want to send a photocopied page from your favorite dictionary
they might refer you to the phrase “fair use”. Please counter with a dictionary page for “fair”.. and explain that you couldn’t care less about how someone else is- or isn’t using their service as you are paying for your service only. “unlimited until we say otherwise” sounds terribly liberalese.
Tell them in your letter that you are planning to write to the PUC (Public Utilities Commision) allegding fraud or deceptive business practices. ISPs and Telcos cringe when they read such things. If the ISP doesn’t shape up do send a letter to the PUC and CC the ISP.
(yes, I really would… and I’ve done something similar to verizon wireless. I wish I had recorded the conversations)
“What a sad age we live in. Next, we’ll be forced to take down statues that conflict with Islamic beliefs.”
no, in keeping with our times…
the Statue of Liberty will be a burkah wearing transgender person with
the koran in one hand and a grenade in the other sporting an explosive
chastity belt
riiiight. And what of other deviants like some sociopaths? ‘They were born with the inclination to rape and murder. They are entitled to their feelings. You cannot tell them not to derive sexual pleasure from torturing innocent people nor can you prevent them from sating themselves’
isn’t relativism fun?
wait.. the typical response will make some reference to hurt or injury and or consent. The *thumbnailed* response is to have you recognize intangible injury, as from this thread the non-physical damage done to a child, transcendental if you will. If you cannot admit of the former then the discussion is over as your values are such.. your attempt to inflict your deviant expectation of warped-tolerance. If you do grasp the concept we can explore further the type of injury upon another in a consensual deviant sexual relationship and the nature of love, which has not yet been explored here.
Consent does not mitigate harm. Choice does not effect justice. Perception does not effect change in the object. Freedom is not license. Unwanted consequences do not cease to exist.
Homosexual acts, as with other deviant activities with regard to grave issues, are an affront to the dignity of the actor and recipient, and then some.
The hypocritical intolerance is rife. Why can’t you people be tolerant of parents who don’t wish to scandalize their own children? That’s awfully hateful of you. Only you have the right to be offended? Why is that exactly?
What about to each his own?
You queers get bent out of shape when you think other people are controlling how you live, but yet when the pro-deviant movement tries regulate what parents teach their children, and those same parents object you’re shocked? Keep your moralphobia to yourself.
You deny absolute truth, and then insist that the tenants of liberalism are the only truth? Nope, no faulty logic there.
Anarchy for all?
(As a teeny tiny minority are you sure that’s a wise ideology for you deviants to pursue?)
Jesus might ’shop’ at walmart because he ate with sinners, reprobates, and the like. Jesus loves all including those with honosexual tendancies. Remember he forgave the whore telling her to go AND sin no more… not hey your cool have a nice day. Activities not chaste (or otherwise not virtuous) are not to be tolerated… the person is in need of conversion, repentance, forgivness, absolution, and amended behavior.
The question is: should YOU shop at Walmart today? especially given their new position of donating 5% of proceeds to pro-homosexual-activity (anti-Christian) advocacy groups… obviously the answer is certainly not! Just as YOU shouldn’t buy Ben n Jerry ice cream as a large slice of their proceeds are donated to pro-natal-child-slaughter-houses (abotion).
Homosexual activites are sinful (evil) and therefore must NOT be tolerated, nor should one tolerate, encourage, or enable others to do or support likewise. The same is true for pro-wrong-choice groups (abotion).
Richards said that [the principal's practice of sending the honor roll to local media] have
a dark side, creating a competitive culture among students where grades
are compared within groups and argued over with teachers.
Get that parents? Encouraging your kid to do well is a bad, bad
thing. They might compete. They might even meet other kids
who want to be at the top of their class and then they’ll be
striving to make even better grades. Damn you awful parents for
breeding this kind of behavior! – TheBitchGirls.us
gotta love those Girls
protest DRM
The “Americans” behind Draconian Rights Mangling need to have their
respective optical orifices gouged out with a rusty, analog soup
utensil!
http://muniwireless.com/community/962
sobering reminder of just how unbelievably slow (and, at the same
time, expensive) broadband services are in the US and many other
countries. Here’s a brief list:
BIGLOBE NTT East B-Flets VDSL (East Japan):
$52.77
100Mbps/100Mbps
NIFTY NTT West B-Flets VDSL (West Japan)
$48.56
100Mbps/100Mbps
BB. Excite NTT East B-Flets VDSL
$51.15
100Mbps/100Mbps
USEN broad-gate 01 LAN type:
$43.08
100Mbps/100Mbps
NIFTY TEPCO VDSL type:
$38.59
100Mbps/100Mbps
NIFTY TEPCO E type:
$33.21
100Mbps/100Mbps
KDDI Hikari Plus-Net DION (VDSL):
$35.00
100Mbps/ 35Mbps
USEN broad-gate 01 VDSL type:
$25.47
100Mbps/ 50Mbps
Average: $41.00 for a 100Mbps/85Mbps line.
For a list of Verizon’s FIOS prices, click here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Homophobia
I am confused. If we aren’t holding words to their literal meaning, why are we writing encyclopedia entries about them? — bikeable (talk) 19:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
The pedophiles and liberalists have on many occasions deleted WORDS like “moralphobe” and “moralphobia” calling them neologisms all the while wrongly tolerating the entry on the colloquialism “homophobia”. Double standard? The talk article even linked to “Moralityphobia“. It was swiftly delted in a state of frantic moralphobia.
Moralphobia APTLY describes the fear driving the deletion of the word itself. As commented above there’s no place in wikipedia for the colloquialism “homophobia”.
Feast on Sagacious Sagacious Syndication Snippets
